Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise stated, all text in this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.


Showing posts with label web 2.0. Show all posts
Showing posts with label web 2.0. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Google hearts Jaiku

Screenshot of Jaiku Google announcement The Google acquisition train just keeps on rolling down the tracks.

I logged on to Jaiku this morning to be greeted with the information that it has become yet another member of the Googleplex.  The acquisition seems to have created quite a stir across the tech news blogosphere (for example here, here and here).  There seems to be two common themes:

  1. Jaiku isn't nearly as good as Twitter, so why didn't Google buy that service instead? (rubbish by the way, I grew to hate Twitter very quickly as an unreliable, US-centric elitist self-congratulatory club, but that's just me)
  2. It's all got something to do with the rumoured GPhone and competing with Facebook

My money is on the latter of the points, regardless of my own personal opinion of the Twitter service.

What I find most disappointing is that finally I was enjoying using a service that wasn't a Google owned one, which meant that at least some of my online presence wasn't being absorbed by the 'Plex at Mountain View.  Every time I try and break away, they just suck me right back in *sigh*

On the other hand, I'm very happy for the Jaiku crew who have all acted like a bunch of upright gentleman (and one of the co-founders is a sociologist by training, which is even cooler - I love finding fellow sociologists!) so I feel this is a well deserved break for them.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Recycling information: the innovation behind the mashups

Business Pundit is currently featuring an article that frustrates and annoys me yet leaves me in semi-agreement, which only serves to frustrate and annoy me all over again ("The dangers of re-use: how mashups can stifle innovation").  The premise of the item appears to be that unless you know a technology to its deepest level, you are doing little more than playing make-believe, pretending you are doing something new when instead you are drowning the world in your own mediocrity.  The argument has a distinct Keensian elitist tone, inferring that unless you understand your tools you have no right to be using them.

I felt somewhat mislead about the article in general.  It's not until the very end that I discovered (hence my annoyance) that the core assertion was not that mashups were mediocre and boring (they can be) but instead was that mashups need to be kept in perspective (which I agree with) and urges the reader not to confuse "imitation with innovation" (which I didn't think I was, but there you go).

Like the author, a lot of mashups leave me cold.  After all, I don't really care if I can geo-tag a photo on Flickr and locate it in Google Earth so I can see exactly where on this planet an out-of-focus photo of a bee was taken.  However, that is not the point.  It is not the mashup that is the innovation, rather what makes the mashup possible.  RSS feeds, open APIs, enabling services like Pipes - the ability to mine and manipulate vast quantities of previously unavailable data has enormous potential.

I see this as a classic forest/trees, baby/bath water confusion.  Just because the results don't inspire you (and are used indiscriminately by the great unwashed) doesn't automatically diminish the value and importance and potential of the underlying framework.

Now if you will excuse me, I think I will go off and see if I can combine my low quality cameraphone photos of my son with Google Maps.  Spite is such a wonderful motivational technique after all.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Facebook etiquette: Finally!

Note: An updated and revised version of this post can now be found at techwhimsy.com.


I am happy to concede that I was slow to jump on the Facebook bandwagon. After all, there is only so much adopting that one can do in a fast paced, 2.0 "must be the first, oh please, I just have to be the first" fashion and Facebook was over that threshold. However, once I signed up, I found myself bewildered as I had no context for the rules of engagement. I needed an etiquette guide and I maintain that social networks like Facebook are failing their new users when they don't at least point to a user-generated guide.

Enter Wired's new How To Wiki. I am relieved that the community has filled the gaping void and provided meaning to the bewildering array of behaviours I have witnessed in my short time on the 'book. I present to you Save Face on Facebook.

The list seems like common sense to me. All except the one about not writing on your own wall, that is. Why is that? The whole Wall-to-Wall thing seems counter-intuitive to me and I think that's one for the Facebook usability gurus to work on. Apart from that one lapse, I'm happily powering my laptop with my own sense of inflated self-satisfaction.

There should be more etiquette guides to social networks. I hope that this is just the start of something bigger for the social network movement.

Cosmopolitan's New Etiquette Guide originally uploaded to Flickr by numberstumper and edited by me. Used under a Creative Commons By Attribution - Sharealike 2.0 licence.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Governments behave questionably on Wikipedia. Media pretends to be shocked.



Wikiscanner has been fun, hasn't it? For those who have come in late, Wikiscanner traces the IP addresses of edits to Wikipedia back to home organisations. It's a simple idea really, and it has been marvelous in its execution. All manner of dodgy edits from corporations have floated to the surface (see this collection from Wired for a start) and perhaps least surprisingly, governments have been in the thick of making changes, too.

Australia isn't coming out of this cleanly with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Defence copping some unwanted attention due to the editing activities of its staff. While the SMH article does indicate that most edits were legitimate ones, that still means that some weren't including (according to this Techcrunch article) some hot political issues locally like the Children Overboard affair and mandatory detention.

The biggest surprise about this story? That anyone is surprised at all. Governments do some apparently shifty things some times. More often, individuals with a particular issue to grind will do even shiftier things. Individuals work in Government departments that may or may not do shifty things. Is this news? Yes. Is this a scandal? Not really. Anyone using Wikipedia as a definitive resource will get what's coming to them anyway.

Move along people, there's very little to see here. Some people got caught out while other legitimate Wikipedia users will suffer as access to the resource is restricted. I think the big lesson out of all of this is that anonymity online is something of a myth unless you go to great efforts that are probably disproportionate to what you are trying to achieve anyway.

I think there's something in that for all of us.

Monday, August 20, 2007

All up in your Facebook, Australian style. Is it all just a waste of time?



Facebook has been dragging its feet in the Australian social market since it was opened up to all-comers nearly a year ago. While it's adoption rate in major markets like the US and UK has been pretty impressive, take up hasn't been quite so good here in Australia as I mentioned in this recent post. However, you know something has moved from bleeding edge to man-in-the-street when it gets slammed in the local press as a "$5 billion waste of time".

The press feeding frenzy seems to be based on a press release by web filtering company Surfcontrol and the figure would appear to based on an estimate that 800,000 employees spending one hour per day on Facebook while on company time. I say "seems" and "appears" because I can't find any mention of these details on the Surfcontrol site at all. In fact, if you do find it, let me know as I'm dying to see where these magical figures have come from.

I'll set aside the dream-like quality of the $5 billion (and indeed the "hour per day" and "800,000" as well - perhaps they can all duck out for a quick drink while they wait) as unverifiable and until proven, a bit giggle-worthy. What interests me is the knee-jerk corporate reaction that anyone not spending every spare minute of their day cranking out the company widget is "wasting time".

Ross Dawson on the Trends in Living Networks blog writes:

Of course, this is not to say that there aren’t plenty of company employees working on improving their social lives while they draw a salary.

However, the more important side of the story is that in a knowledge-based economy such as Australia, effective networking is absolutely essential to corporate productivity.

And he's absolutely right.

I am not yet convinced of the usefulness of Facebook in a business setting. This may be because I work in a public administration environment where Facebook-style networking is useful. I would also argue that there is no need for Facebook to waste time here when there are just as many committees, high level working groups and "cross silo information facilitation" sessions that achieve this goal much more successfully than Facebook ever could. It is only a matter time, however, before the right type of social network bursts on to the scene.

Companies that assume that any activity that isn't directed towards achieving the company business plan or (cringe) mission statement is leaving itself open to the risk of falling behind when the wave does hit. Ross also makes an excellent point when he writes:

... in May, usage of Facebook in Australia was around one quarter of that in the US and UK. Australia needs to catch up in its networking, NOT stop in its tracks.

Australia seems woefully under connected in global networks. As national borders become increasingly relegated to antiquated political constructs, ephemeral social networks are going to become more important and an ever growing source of information and even employment. Case in point here is the Finnish social network Jaiku whose system administrator is firmly and happily implanted in New Zealand, half a world and many a timezone away.

Employers need to stop looking at how to prevent their staff from networking on company time and need to start looking at how they can use this energy and activity to their benefit. Do this, or risk being left behind.

Monday, July 30, 2007

So. I'm on Facebook. Now what?



The tide became irresistible. I caved in and signed up to the Facebook thing that all the kids are talking about (at least now my wife will stop nagging me to join). If you have been wondering where I have been for the last week or so, now you know.

I've joined, I've built a profile, I've played with some apps and I've even got a (very small) handful of friends. However, I have no idea what I'm supposed to do next. Everyone is talking about Facebook but it still seems to be passing me by. Maybe I don't get it. Maybe I'm subconsciously non-committal about investing time in yet another social network. Maybe I'm going to be hampered by my decision to only be friends with people I interact with on a personal level.

Maybe I just need more friends.

If you're reading this and you know me in some way and you're on Facebook, tell me what I'm missing. I really want to know.

At least I feel good about totally skipping the whole Myspace thing.

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Citizen cartography

A career in cartography used to be the prerogative of well-funded adventurers — men like Rennell or Lewis and Clark — with full government backup ... Now, suddenly, mapmaking power is within the grasp of a 12-year-old.

- Wired: Google Maps is changing the way we see the world



I use Google Maps almost on a daily basis, particularly when trying to find the location of specific rural services. The ability to quickly locate remote locations is becoming invaluable to me.

In fact, a work-related mapping project popped in to my head which could be quite useful in informing some upcoming policy development and review processes. I wouldn't have been able to do this 12 months ago, yet alone two, three or five years ago.

Once again I find myself thinking that it is an amazing time to be alive right now, where geographically disparate chunks of information can be collated and visualised with a few clicks of the mouse.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Apple has a strange definition of "third party apps"



One of the "big" announcements to come out of Apple's 2007 WWDC is that it has released the latest version of its web browser Safari for both Windows and the Mac.

One of the main reasons for this is that Apple won't be releasing a Software Developers Kit (SDK) for the iPhone, which will have Safari3 embedded. Apple is promoting the use of AJAX as the way for third parties to get applications onto the iPhone instead of providing an SDK that would allow developers to hook into the OS X guts of the device.



It would appear that Apple is hoping that by porting Safari3 to Windows, more developers will be encouraged to create Safari-friendly web apps. As I understand it, the current state of Web 2.0 is somewhat hit and miss when it comes to compatibility with Safari.

Steve Jobs (CEO of Apple) said at his keynote at WWDC that no SDK was required as anyone who could develop AJAX apps would be able to develop for the iPhone. While it's a good move from Apple to release Safari on Windows to increase the size of the potential developer pool, it's drawing a long bow to call AJAX web sites "third party apps". Gizmodo has an excellent piece on why AJAX isn't quite good enough including:
  • limited integration with iPhone OS X internals (possibly a good thing from a security point of view)
  • little or no capacity for local data storage
    capacity for data heavy apps to work over the slower-than-broadband EDGE mobile technology that the iPhone will launch with

I have to adopt a wait-and-see attitude anyway, given that the iPhone won't be launching in Australia until 2008 at the earliest. Also unanswered is how well the iPhone will synch with a Windows machine as I don't have a Mac. Finally, concerns about local price and chosen network provider in Australia mean that I won't have to struggle with the absence of quality third party apps for quite some time.

Edit 18/6/07 13:59: Photos are courtesy of Apple, Inc.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Twitter hits the mainstream...

...just as I'm about to wave goodbye to it.



The Sydney Morning Herald has a three page article on Twitter, the latest darling of the hyped-up 2.0 set.

This amuses me as, once again, I'm stepping off a bandwagon just as the mainstream media picks up on it. I was curious about Twitter for a number of reasons, including because it was new, it revelled in its simplicity but also because it was the latest brainwave of Evan Williams, the creator of Blogger, before it was assimilated by Google.

Ultimately, I just didn't really get Twitter. Maybe it was because I didn't have any actual friends, real or virtual, who used the service. In the end it became almost like a micro-rss reader as I slowly stopped updating my own account but kept reading a handful of others. It hasn't helped that Australian users were denied SMS access while Twitter changed the UK number it recommended we use, while at the same time it seemed like the Twitter servers were down every other day. Scaling up can be a hassle sometimes, I guess.

So now I'm on that other great micro-blogging hype machine, Jaiku. Jaiku is similar, but has more features such as comments and "channels" (kind of like an old-school irc channel with a shiny 2.0 interface) and, to me, a stronger feeling of community.

*shrug*

I might just as likely drop Jaiku as quickly as I've let Twitter slide. Half of the fun is trying out new things so it won't be time wasted, even if it wasn't time spent being productive.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Love, Jaiku style

I took a 5 minute break from reading lecture notes to cruise past my Jaiku contacts, only to discover that their servers are temporarily overloaded as I was greeted with this:

Jaiku's "Busy" message

I love "Server down" messages that remind us geeks that there are other, better things they could be doing right now.

Of course, I could chat with someone I love, but her Gmail chat icon is on "idle", so by the time she saw my message, I would be back to my lecture notes and the moment would have passed.

What do you mean wrong "chat"?

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Viral done right

i am trying to believe
another version of the truth
be the hammer
105th airborne crusaders
church of plano
consolidated mail systems
us wiretap
art is resistance
hollywood in memoriam
solutions backwards initiative, which redirects to secure broadcast informatics
judson ogram correctional facility
the water turned to blood
cedo core
the mailstrom
operation swamp0000
operation chipsweep
the price of treason
open source resistance

http://www.echoingthesound.org/phpbbx/viewtopic.php?t=21636
http://www.echoingthesound.org/phpbbx/viewtopic.php?t=22088

http://www.ninwiki.com/Main_Page

In case you hadn't heard, Nine Inch Nails have a new album coming out 17 April, Year Zero.

Hidden messages. Secret websites. Tracks leaked on usb drives found at NIN concerts. Hints to billboards. Phone numbers hidden inside tracks themselves that need a spectrograph to find them. So much more...

If I was still at uni and had spare time, I'd be following this like a man possessed. These are people who "get it".

As usual though, it looks like not everyone does.

Sunday, April 01, 2007

Another spectacular Google service

Gmail Paper.

Be sure to read the program policies. I know EULAs can be boring most of the time, but you are definitely going to want to check these policies out before signing up.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Tim O'Reilly is a big fat tease

What kind of man raves about a shiny new product that is possibly the best thing he has ever seen, just knowing that thousands of people will flock to it based on his weighty reputation alone, knowing full well that the damn thing is still in alpha and not available to great unwashed (ie: me)?

What kind of man? Tim? You want to field this one?

I'll tell you. Big fat tease, that's what kind of man.

:P~

Tim O'Reilly was raving about Virtual Ubiquity web-based processor, writing:

It may well be the slickest word processor I've seen anywhere


Big words. Too bad I can't check it out to see how good it really is. Tim makes it sound good, but I've fallen for that hype before.

Edited 28/2/07 16:01 to fix a malformed link to Tim O'Reilly's blog post. It should be working fine now. Mea culpa.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Google Maps optioned up in Australia

It might not sound like much to some, but a beefed up Google Maps service is finally being launched in Australia.

The pundits seem to be excited about Google's partnership with News Ltd, the Australian subsidiary (and former parent company) of News Corp, to create a domestic business search function, putting it in competition with Telstra and it's offshoot Sensis, which manages the Yellow and White Pages, as well as the sometimes excellent Whereis.com, which provides a mapping and directions service (particularly useful for mapping out routes or working out how far away your hotel is from the nearest pub). Apparently, this will spark some sort of competition, leading to improvements for all consumers. Something like that anyway.

Me? I'm just excited that finally Google Maps provides some decent coverage and linked services for Australian cities. I can't wait to see what funky mash-ups the kids will come up with using the Maps API. There's a good round-up of mash-ups already available at Google Maps Mania, but I want even more funkiness.

I'd do it myself, but that would take skill, talent and possibly even a fresh idea, all of which are currently in short supply with the pixelated one.

See also:
news.com.au - Web deal for Google, News
Sky News Australia - Google Maps launch

Monday, January 29, 2007

Bill Gates talks up computer/TV convergence

This has been sprinkled all over the place, but Bill Gates thinks that the internet will revolutionise television, according to reports coming out of this year's .

Gates points to phenomenon like the popularity of YouTube and other online video services as evidence that people are becoming increasingly disenchanted with what is served up by traditional broadcasters. He does have a good point when he was quoted by eWeek as saying:

"Certain things like elections or the Olympics really point out how TV is terrible. You have to wait for the guy to talk about the thing you care about or you miss the event and want to go back and see it..."Internet presentation of these things is vastly superior."

Major sporting events are perfect for this sort of content delivery, particularly as it allows people to select what niche sport they want to watch, rather than having to sit through whatever the broadcaster thinks will rate best.

I don't think people will want to watch YouTube on their HD TVs, but I do think that 2007 and 2008 will see an explosion in internet-enabled devices that we plug into our TVs. Having "black box" modules will probably also make it easier for manufacturers to and firmware designers to add new features and deal with content licensing issues without causing problems for a device's core functionality (are you listening, Microsoft?)

Interestingly, the WEF also had a meeting of the minds on how Web 2.0 will mould the future. I caught some of this discussion on CNN at about 5:00 this morning (because someone wouldn't go to sleep - at all) and quite frankly, it was a little bit disappointing. The usual buzzwords being churned out by the usual talking heads. However, given the time of day and extreme lack of sleep (and the fact that I only caught about 10 minutes of it), I will happily concede I may have missed something (or the point of the discussion entirely). I note that the WEF blurb quotes YouTube founder Chad Hurley and I don't recall seeing Chad on the TV at all, so maybe I really did miss the important bits. There's also the possibility that I was watching another collection of talking heads in a Web 2.0 seminar in Davos, Switzerland, because I don't recall seeing Bill Gates talking either. In fact, the only name I do recognise is the woman who co-founded Flickr, so perhaps I was just delirious after all.